ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing chickpea yield prediction under wilt disease through synergistic integration of biophysical and image parameters using machine learning models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AdapTree: Data-Driven Approach to Assessing Plant Stress Through the AI-Sensor Synergy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop health assessment and early yield predictions are highly crucial under biotic stress conditions for crop management and market planning by farmers and policy planners. The objective of this study was, therefore, to assess the impact of different levels of wilt disease on the biophysical parameters of chickpea and developing machine learning (ML) models for early yield prediction. Field experiments were carried out over three years at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute research farm in New Delhi. Thermal and visible images were collected alongside the measurement of crop biophysical parameters, including leaf area index (LAI), photosynthesis, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative leaf water content (RWC), membrane stability index (MSI), and NDVI, for 85 chickpea genotypes with varying levels of wilt resistance. ML models were developed for early yield prediction by combining visible and thermal image indices with biophysical parameters. The results showed that the canopy temperatures were directly correlated with increasing levels of wilt severity. Crop photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, LAI, RWC, MSI, and NDVI dropped significantly with increasing levels of wilt severity. Yield reductions of 44-69% were observed in susceptible genotypes. Machine learning models were able to give accurate early yield predictions. The accuracy of the models increases as we move closer to the harvest. Ranking of the model's performances indicated that XGB is the best model to predict chickpea yield under wilt conditions. NDVI was identified as most important variable for yield prediction. The findings of the study quantified the impacts of wilt on important crop biophysical parameters and highlighted the suitability of ML models in early yield prediction under different levels of disease severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.