Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910102›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing chickpea yield prediction under wilt disease through synergistic integration of biophysical and image parameters using machine learning models.

R N Singh, P Krishnan, C Bharadwaj, Sonam Sah, B Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R N SinghDivision of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
P KrishnanDivision of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India. prameelakrishnan@yahoo.com.
C BharadwajDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sonam SahICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
B DasICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, Old Goa, Goa, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop health assessment and early yield predictions are highly crucial under biotic stress conditions for crop management and market planning by farmers and policy planners. The objective of this study was, therefore, to assess the impact of different levels of wilt disease on the biophysical parameters of chickpea and developing machine learning (ML) models for early yield prediction. Field experiments were carried out over three years at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute research farm in New Delhi. Thermal and visible images were collected alongside the measurement of crop biophysical parameters, including leaf area index (LAI), photosynthesis, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative leaf water content (RWC), membrane stability index (MSI), and NDVI, for 85 chickpea genotypes with varying levels of wilt resistance. ML models were developed for early yield prediction by combining visible and thermal image indices with biophysical parameters. The results showed that the canopy temperatures were directly correlated with increasing levels of wilt severity. Crop photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, LAI, RWC, MSI, and NDVI dropped significantly with increasing levels of wilt severity. Yield reductions of 44-69% were observed in susceptible genotypes. Machine learning models were able to give accurate early yield predictions. The accuracy of the models increases as we move closer to the harvest. Ranking of the model's performances indicated that XGB is the best model to predict chickpea yield under wilt conditions. NDVI was identified as most important variable for yield prediction. The findings of the study quantified the impacts of wilt on important crop biophysical parameters and highlighted the suitability of ML models in early yield prediction under different levels of disease severity.

Indexed as

CicerMachine LearningPlant DiseasesCrops, AgriculturalGenotypePhotosynthesisPlant LeavesCanopy temperatureImage indicesLAIMembrane stabilityPhotosynthesissRPI

Identifiers

PMID39910102
PMCPMC11799175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.