Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39910096›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Detecting gene copy number alterations by Oncomine Comprehensive genomic profiling in a comparative study on FFPE tumor samples.

Fabio Bozzi, Elena Conca, Marco Silvestri, Gianpaolo Dagrada, Alice Ardore, Donata Penso, Daniele Lorenzini, Chiara Costanza Volpi, Desirè Viola Trupia, Adele Busico and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genomic instability andFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Fabio Bozzi *Department of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Elena Conca *Department of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Marco SilvestriDepartment of Research, Nutrition and Metabolomics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Gianpaolo DagradaDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Alice ArdoreDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Donata PensoDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Daniele LorenziniDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Chiara Costanza VolpiDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Desirè Viola TrupiaDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Adele BusicoDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Iolanda CaponeDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Federica PerroneDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Elena TamboriniDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Andrea VingianiDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.
Luca AgnelliDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy. luca.agnelli@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Giancarlo PruneriDepartment of Diagnostic Innovation, Pathology Unit 2, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milano, 20133, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute, Italy CORR24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number alterations (CNAs) play a fundamental role in cancer development and constitute a potential tool for tailored treatments. The CNAs recognition in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) material for diagnostic purposes has relied for years mainly on fluorescence in situ hybridization. The introduction of other procedures, such as Next-Generation Sequencing has dramatically improved CNAs discovery at genome-wide level. The detection of CNAs by NGS in FFPE material is, nonetheless, a complex issue, which still requires validation studies. Herein, the CNAs detection by a widely used NGS assay (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay plus

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGene DosageGenomicsNeoplasmsFormaldehydeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID39910096
PMCPMC11799426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.