Trial reportScientific reports2025
Virtual reality head-mounted display game for intermittent exotropia in a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exercise and visual training interventions for myopia in children and adolescents: a systematic review with a focus on near-far accommodation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Virtual Reality-Based Vision Therapy for Intermittent Exotropia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Review
- Virtual Reality Orthoptic Interventions for Binocular Vision Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Review
- Digital therapy using dichoptic visual perceptual learning to improve stereopsis in children with intermittent exotropia.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the effects of orthoptic training using a virtual reality (VR) head-mounted display game in patients with intermittent exotropia (IXT), a prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed in 62 patients ≥ 13 years with IXT of ≥ 8 prism diopters (∆) and with a near ≥ distance angle, i.e., basic type and convergence insufficiency-type IXT. Patients were randomly assigned to a video-game group that induced convergence (exercise group) and a placebo-game group not inducing convergence (control group), and completed the program 15 min/day for 4 weeks. Subjective symptom scores, angle of exodeviation, near point of convergence, stereoacuity, fusional control scores using the Newcastle Control Score (NCS) and the Office Control Score (OCS) were noted. Outcome measures were assessed after 4 weeks, and re-evaluated after a washout period of 4 weeks. After using the VR game for 4 weeks, the near angle of exodeviation significantly decreased from 29.6 ± 9.5∆ to 25.3 ± 9.0∆ in the exercise group (p < 0.001), which was still maintained after 4 weeks of discontinuation (p = 0.008). There were no significant differences in the near angle of exodeviation in the control group at either the 4- or 8-week visits (p = 0.075, 0.093, respectively). The fusional control scores of the NCS and OCS significantly improved at the 4-week (p = 0.001, 0.003, respectively) and 8-week visits (p = 0.004, < 0.001, respectively) only in the exercise group. In conclusion, orthoptic training using a VR game improved the near angle of exodeviation and fusional control scores in IXT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.