ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Automatic Identification of Fetal Abdominal Planes from Ultrasound Images Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal landmark detection and classification of fetal growth conditions on obstetric ultrasound: a gestational age-conditioned multi-task network.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- A multicentre benchmark dataset for comprehensive landmark-based fetal ultrasound biometry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated segmentation and quantitative measurement of cervical nerves in ultrasound images using an SZJ-SEG-based deep learning framework.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal biometric assessments through ultrasound diagnostics are integral in obstetrics and gynecology, requiring considerable time investment. This study aimed to explore the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) architectures in automatically identifying fetal abdominal standard scanning planes and structures, particularly focusing on the abdominal circumference. Ultrasound images from a prospective cohort study were preprocessed using CV2 and Keras-OCR to eliminate textual elements and artifacts. Optical character recognition detected and removed textual components, followed by inpainting using adjacent pixels. Six deep learning neural networks, Xception and MobileNetV3Large, were employed to categorize fetal abdominal view planes. The dataset included nine classes, and the models were evaluated through a tenfold cross-validation cycle. The MobileNet3Large and EfficientV2S achieved accuracy rates of 79.89% and 79.19%, respectively. Data screening confirmed non-normal distribution, but the central limit theorem was applied for statistical analysis. ANOVA test revealed statistically significant differences between the models, while Tukey's post hoc tests showed no difference between MobileNet3Large and EfficientV2S, while outperforming the other networks. AI, specifically MobileNet3Large and EfficientV2S, demonstrated promise in identifying fetal abdominal view planes, showcasing potential benefits for prenatal ultrasound diagnostics. Further studies should compare these AI models with established methods for automatic abdominal circumference measurement to assess overall performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.