ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Management and long-term follow-up of basilar trunk artery aneurysms: a single center experience.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Basilar trunk artery (BTA) aneurysm is a serious disease, management of which remains controversial and challenging. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 67 patients with 72 BTA aneurysms diagnosed and treated at our institution. Finally, 39 participants underwent conservative treatment and 27 received endovascular surgical treatment, including one patient who underwent external carotid artery-radial artery-second segment of the posterior cerebral artery bypass. Data on patient clinical and aneurysm characteristics were collected and risk factors for unfavorable outcome and death analyzed. 33 patients presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage and 15 had a poor Hunt-Hess grade. Mean aneurysm diameter was 14.8 ± 12.6 mm and 28 aneurysms were > 15 mm. The total proportions of favorable outcome and mortality at discharge were 64.2% and 17.9%, respectively, while the corresponding proportions in the surgery groups were 53.6% and 17.9%. Moreover, we conducted long-term follow-up from initial diagnosis to 3 years. 57 patients had ≥ 6 months of follow-up and 31 patients reached 3 years. Mean follow-up time was 23.23 ± 21.58 months. The proportions of patients with unfavorable outcome and death increased in the group undergoing conservative treatment during the 3-year follow-up period. Further, the natural rupture rate increased from 43.3% initial diagnosis to 81.8% at 3 years. Poor Hunt-Hess grade was an important risk factor for unfavorable outcome and death. Undergoing surgery was a protective factor against death at six months; however, the complications rate was higher in the surgery group than that in patients receiving conservative treatment. In conclusion, although BTA aneurysm management remains controversial and unsatisfactory, patients with BTA aneurysm in the surgical intervention group appeared to have better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39909954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.