Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39909898›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

PlaqueViT: a vision transformer model for fully automatic vessel and plaque segmentation in coronary computed tomography angiography.

Jennifer Alvén, Richard Petersen, David Hagerman, Mårten Sandstedt, Pieter Kitslaar, Göran Bergström, Erika Fagman, Ola Hjelmgren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer AlvénDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Richard PetersenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
David HagermanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mårten SandstedtDepartment of Radiology in Linköping, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Pieter KitslaarMedis Medical Imaging, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Göran BergströmDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Erika FagmanDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ola HjelmgrenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. ola.hjelmgren@wlab.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8639-6928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and evaluate a deep learning model for segmentation of the coronary artery vessels and coronary plaques in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). MATERIALS AND

methodsCCTA image data from the Swedish CardioPulmonary BioImage Study (SCAPIS) was used for model development (n = 463 subjects) and testing (n = 123) and for an interobserver study (n = 65). A dataset from Linköping University Hospital (n = 28) was used for external validation. The model's ability to detect coronary artery disease (CAD) was tested in a separate SCAPIS dataset (n = 684). A deep ensemble (k = 6) of a customized 3D vision transformer model was used for voxelwise classification. The Dice coefficient, the average surface distance, Pearson's correlation coefficient, analysis of segmented volumes by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and agreement (sensitivity and specificity) were used to analyze model performance.

resultsPlaqueViT segmented coronary plaques with a Dice coefficient = 0.55, an average surface distance = 0.98 mm and ICC = 0.93 versus an expert reader. In the interobserver study, PlaqueViT performed as well as the expert reader (Dice coefficient = 0.51 and 0.50, average surface distance = 1.31 and 1.15 mm, ICC = 0.97 and 0.98, respectively). PlaqueViT achieved 88% agreement (sensitivity 97%, specificity 76%) in detecting any coronary plaque in the test dataset (n = 123) and 89% agreement (sensitivity 95%, specificity 83%) in the CAD detection dataset (n = 684).

conclusionWe developed a deep learning model for fully automatic plaque detection and segmentation that identifies and delineates coronary plaques and the arterial lumen with similar performance as an experienced reader. KEY POINTS: Question A tool for fully automatic and voxelwise segmentation of coronary plaques in coronary CTA (CCTA) is important for both clinical and research usage of the CCTA examination. Findings Segmentation of coronary artery plaques by PlaqueViT was comparable to an expert reader's performance. Clinical relevance This novel, fully automatic deep learning model for voxelwise segmentation of coronary plaques in CCTA is highly relevant for large population studies such as the Swedish CardioPulmonary BioImage Study.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseDeep LearningPlaque, AtheroscleroticRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAgedCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityComputed tomography angiographyComputer-assistedCoronary artery diseaseRadiographic image interpretation

Identifiers

PMID39909898
PMCPMC12226657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.