ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Unveiling the potential of copper-61 vs. gallium-68 for SSTR PET imaging.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- FROM DISCOVERY SCIENCE TO THE CLINIC - HERITABLE ENDOCRINE CANCERS AND RELATED DISORDERS: Functional imaging in hereditary endocrine neoplasms: evolving modalities and clinical implications.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026Review
- Specific reaction conditions for efficient automatedFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn recent years, copper-61 has attracted considerable attention from both physicists and radiochemists due to its favorable physical decay properties for PET imaging and its ease of production at any cyclotron center producing [
methodsCopper-61 was produced by irradiation of natural zinc liquid targets, followed by post-processing. In vitro evaluation of
resultsHigh molar activity [
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.