ArticlePsychological medicine2025
Multidimensional outcome of first-episode psychosis: a network analysis.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Jumping to conclusions bias in early psychosis: Relationships with symptom dimensions, neurocognition and social cognition.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026Article
- Multidimensional outcome of first-episode psychosis: a network analysis - CORRIGENDUM.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have examined the long-term outcomes of first-episode psychosis (FEP) among patients beyond symptomatic and functional remission. This study aimed to broaden the scope of outcome indicators by examining the relationships between 12 outcomes of FEP patients at 20.9 years after their initial diagnosis.
methodsAt follow-up, 220 out of 550 original patients underwent a new assessment. Twelve outcomes were assessed via semistructured interviews and complementary scales: symptom severity, functional impairment, personal recovery, social disadvantage, physical health, number of suicide attempts, number of episodes, current drug use, dose-years of antipsychotics (DYAps), cognitive impairment, motor abnormalities, and DSM-5 final diagnosis. The relationships between these outcome measures were investigated using Spearman's correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis, while the specific connections between outcomes were ascertained using network analysis.
resultsThe outcomes were significantly correlated; specifically, symptom severity, functioning, and personal recovery showed the strongest correlations. Exploratory factor analysis of the 12 outcomes revealed two factors, with 11 of the 12 outcomes loading on the first factor. Network analysis revealed that symptom severity, functioning, social disadvantage, diagnosis, cognitive impairment, DYAps, and number of episodes were the most interconnected outcomes.
conclusionNetwork analysis provided new insights into the heterogeneity between outcomes among patients with FEP. By considering outcomes beyond symptom severity, the rich net of interconnections elucidated herein can facilitate the development of interventions that target potentially modifiable outcomes and generalize their impact on the most interconnected outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.