ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025
Differences in nonheme iron absorption between healthy adults of East Asian or Northern European ancestry from the Iron Genes in East Asian and Northern European Adults Study (FeGenes): A cross-sectional stable iron isotope study.
Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04198545 (Ethnic Differences in Iron Absorption), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ethnic Differences in Iron Absorption
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dietary intake in East Asian and Northern European participants from the FeGenes study.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBecause humans lack mechanisms for excreting excess iron (Fe), dietary Fe absorption must be tightly regulated to ensure optimal Fe levels. We previously showed that East Asian (EA) individuals have higher Fe stores compared with Northern European (NE) individuals, but the physiological basis for this difference is unknown.
objectivesOur aim is to compare nonheme Fe absorption and its regulation in healthy participants of genetically confirmed EA or NE ancestry.
methodsParticipants of this cross-sectional study were males and premenopausal, nonpregnant females of EA (n = 253) or NE (n = 251) ancestry, aged 18-50 y, and without obesity. Participants ingested a stable
resultsSF-corrected % Fe absorption was higher in EA females [27.4 (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.4, 32.0)] and males [19.8 (95% CI: 14.9, 26.4)] compared with NE females [14.8 (95% CI: 11.8, 18.2)] and males [14.9 (95% CI: 11.8, 18.9)], respectively (both P < 0.001). Percent Fe absorption was consistently associated with hepcidin in EA males [β = -0.64; standard error (SE) = 0.24; P = 0.008] and females (β = -0.61; SE = 0.12; P < 0.001), and in NE males (β = -0.63; SE = 0.22; P = 0.005) and females (β = -0.71; SE = 0.14; P < 0.001). Percent Fe absorption was linearly associated with SF in EA females (β = -0.57; SE = 0.09; P < 0.001) and NE males (β = -0.73; SE = 0.21; P < 0.001) and females (β = -0.68; SE = 0.12; P < 0.001), but in EA males, a U-shaped relationship was observed (P = 0.003).
conclusionsEA individuals have a greater SF-corrected Fe absorption compared with NE individuals. Increased Fe absorption and resulting excess Fe accumulation suggests that EA individuals may be at greater risk of Fe overload-related diseases. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term implications of these findings. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04198545.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.