ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Dynamics of Pitch Perception in the Auditory Cortex.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstruction of Imagined Melody with Relative Pitch Decoding in Electrocorticography.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Hierarchical dynamic coding coordinates speech comprehension in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Hierarchical dynamic coding coordinates speech comprehension in the human brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to perceive pitch allows human listeners to experience music, recognize the identity and emotion conveyed by conversational partners, and make sense of their auditory environment. A pitch percept is formed by weighting different acoustic cues (e.g., signal fundamental frequency and interharmonic spacing) and contextual cues (expectation). How and when such cues are neurally encoded and integrated remains debated. In this study, 28 participants (16 female) listened to tone sequences with different acoustic cues (pure tones, complex missing fundamental tones, and tones with an ambiguous mixture), placed in predictable and less predictable sequences, while magnetoencephalography was recorded. Decoding analyses revealed that pitch was encoded in neural responses to all three tone types in the low-to-mid auditory cortex and sensorimotor cortex bilaterally, with right-hemisphere dominance. The pattern of activity generalized across cue types, offset in time: pitch was neurally encoded earlier for harmonic tones (∼85 ms) than pure tones (∼95 ms). For ambiguous tones, pitch emerged significantly earlier in predictable contexts than in unpredictable. The results suggest that a unified neural representation of pitch emerges by integrating independent pitch cues and that context alters the dynamics of pitch generation when acoustic cues are ambiguous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.