Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39909554›Full record

SynthesisRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

The role of prokinetics in managing gastrointestinal involvement in SSc: a systematic literature review.

Alberto Ezquerra-Durán, Luis G Alcala-Gonzalez, Alfredo Guillen-Del-Castillo, Carmen P Simeón-Aznar, Elizabeth Barba, Carolina Malagelada, Michael Hughes, Zsuzsanna H McMahan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alberto Ezquerra-DuránNeurogastroenterology and Motility Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1892-6317
Luis G Alcala-GonzalezDigestive System Research Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3247-1539
Alfredo Guillen-Del-CastilloSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-507X
Carmen P Simeón-AznarSystemic Autoimmune Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3390-9029
Elizabeth BarbaNeurogastroenterology and Motility Unit, Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5986-6592
Carolina MalageladaDigestive System Research Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7097-1492
Michael HughesDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3361-4909
Zsuzsanna H McMahanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, UTHealth Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6461-8940

Funding

Interrogating the pathophysiological mechanisms of constipation in patients with systemic sclerosisR01AR081382 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI Jiande Chen, Zsuzsanna Hortobagyi McMahan · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Carlos III Health InstituteCarlos III Health Institute CM23/00076European UnionEuropean Union PI22/01804Instituto de Salud Carlos IIINeurogastroenterology and MotilityNIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR081382NIH HHS 1 R01 AR081382-01A1Spanish Association of Gastroenterology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGastrointestinal involvement (GI) in SSc is frequent and heterogeneous, manifesting with different degrees of dysmotility. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize evidence on prokinetics for treating SSc-related GI dysmotility.

methodsStudies investigating the effects of prokinetic agents on GI function and/or GI symptoms in patients with SSc were systematically identified on PubMed and Embase. A qualitative data synthesis was conducted, given the (anticipated) wide heterogeneity in study designs, interventions and outcomes.

resultsTwenty-one studies evaluating the effects of prokinetics in patients with SSc were included. Thirteen studies focused on GI motility using objective tests, eight assessed clinical responses, and six evaluated both. Cisapride (n = 5 studies), metoclopramide (n = 7 studies), octreotide (n = 4 studies) and prucalopride (n = 1 study) were among the most studied prokinetics, with varying effects on different GI anatomical regions. While metoclopramide consistently improved overall GI motility, other prokinetics provided selective benefits; cisapride improved gastric emptying and colonic motility, but not oesophageal motility, and octreotide improved small bowel motility but delayed gastric emptying. Regarding symptomatic improvement, only prucalopride was evaluated using a validated patient questionnaire, showing improvement in both upper and lower GI symptoms.

conclusionProkinetic drugs may improve GI motility and symptoms in patients with SSc. There is an unmet need for future well-designed studies to refine patient stratification and optimize treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal AgentsGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal MotilityScleroderma, SystemicBenzofuransCisaprideHumansMetoclopramideOctreotideBenzofuransCisaprideGastrointestinal AgentsMetoclopramideOctreotideprucalopridegastrointestinalprokineticssclerodermasystematic reviewsystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID39909554
PMCPMC12107030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.