ArticleBMJ open2025
Diabetes beliefs, perceived risk and health behaviours: an embedded mixed-methods analysis from the Richmond Stress and Sugar Study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived Risk Perception of Future Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in the Postpartum Period.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of genetic counseling on parental risk perception and prevention strategy utilization for type 2 diabetes in at-risk children.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEfforts to increase engagement with diabetes prevention programmes largely focus on increasing diabetes awareness, with the logic that risk knowledge will motivate behaviour change. However, the salience of perceived risk as it relates to diabetes prevention is contested. The goal of this cross-sectional, embedded mixed-methods study was to examine the relationships between perceived risk, diabetes beliefs and prevention behaviours among adults at elevated risk of type 2 diabetes.
methodsData come from the Richmond Stress and Sugar Study (n=125). Diabetes beliefs (ie, internal, chance, powerful others) were assessed using the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control. Preventive behaviours (eg, changing diet, exercise, tobacco, alcohol) were measured by self-report. Perceived risk of developing diabetes was measured using a probability scale (0%-100%). Logistic and Poisson regression models quantified the relationships between beliefs, behaviours and perceived risk. Qualitative themes regarding challenges and facilitators to preventive behaviours were abstracted from open-ended questions and summarised using content analysis.
resultsPerceived risk of developing diabetes was low (median: 35% likelihood) and only 10% of participants had ever attended a prevention class. None of the diabetes belief domains were significantly associated with either engagement in preventive behaviours or perceived diabetes risk. Perceived diabetes risk was not associated with engagement in preventive behaviours; however, having a family history of diabetes was strongly related to perceived risk (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.42 to 7.86). Qualitative facilitators and barriers of preventive behaviours reflected psychosocial factors (eg, determination, stress, preferences) and resources (eg, social support, time, overall health).
conclusionsPerceptions of risk and health beliefs are not correlated with engagement in preventive behaviours among adults at clinically elevated risk of diabetes. Awareness campaigns may benefit from incorporating family health history information. Diabetes prevention programmes should address barriers beyond health beliefs to promote engagement in behaviour change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.