Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39909519›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Strength training for osteoporosis prevention during early menopause (STOP-EM): a pilot study protocol for a single centre randomised waitlisted control trial in Canada.

Christina J Alexander, Leah Kaluta, Patrick W Whitman, Emma O Billington, Lauren A Burt, Leigh Gabel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05961371 (Strength Training for Osteoporosis Prevention During Early Menopause), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05961371 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Strength Training for Osteoporosis Prevention During Early Menopause

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2023 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsBone Loss, Bone Loss, Age-related, Osteoporosis, Musculoskeletal DiseasesArmsResistance Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina J AlexanderUniversity of Calgary Faculty of Kinesiology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1873-6495
Leah KalutaUniversity of Calgary Faculty of Kinesiology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Patrick W WhitmanUniversity of Calgary Faculty of Kinesiology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Emma O BillingtonUniversity of Calgary McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lauren A BurtUniversity of Calgary McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Leigh GabelUniversity of Calgary Faculty of Kinesiology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada leigh.gabel@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen lose up to 10% of their bone mass around menopause and the decade following. There is a need for proactive approaches to preserve bone mass and quality around menopause. Existing work has found that high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT) can improve bone and muscle measures in late postmenopausal women. However, this has not been investigated in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women who are in the midst of the menopausal transition. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a 9-month randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating a HiRIT programme in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women. The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of HiRIT in 40 perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women (45-60 years). Participants will be randomised 1:1 into a supervised HiRIT exercise intervention and waitlisted control. The primary outcomes are recruitment, retention and adherence to the exercise intervention. Secondary outcomes include bone (bone mineral density, microarchitecture and strength), muscle (mass, strength and power), physical function (balance and aerobic fitness) and quality of life measures. Feasibility will be assessed based on a priori criterion for success and secondary outcomes will be assessed via multiple linear regressions. The study will be considered feasible if>50% of interested and eligible participants are recruited, if there is>60% adherence to the two times per week, 9-month exercise intervention and if at least 65% of the sample complete the final study visit ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Calgary REB22-1632. The results of this study will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in academic journals. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05961371. (Protocol V.1.2, 28 September 2023).

Indexed as

Menopause, PrematureOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalResistance TrainingBone DensityCanadaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMuscle StrengthPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgeingComputed tomographyExerciseFeasibility StudiesFractures, BoneRandomised Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39909519
PMCPMC11800298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.