ArticleBMJ open2025
Feasibility and usefulness of Gini coefficients of primary care visits as a measure of service inequality: preliminary findings from a cross-sectional study using region-wide electronic medical records in Anhui, China.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial and temporal disparities in general practitioner provision: a 21-year longitudinal analysis from Lower Saxony, Germany.International journal of health geographics · 2025Article
- Risk factor analysis of iodinated contrast medium-related hypersensitivity reactions.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Regional Inequities in the Distribution of the Nursing Workforce in Italy.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate inequalities in primary healthcare visits by using the Gini coefficients of primary healthcare visits (GPVs) as derived from large-scale and region-wide electronic records and to explore estimation and utility of GPV.
designThe study used a cross-sectional study design. It first extracted a random sample of 7.09 million primary care records from 1 October 2019 to 31 December 2021. Then it developed logarithmic models of GPVs using different months of records and performed descriptive and generalised linear mixed-effects regression analyses of the GPVs for all-cause diseases. The study also produced topographic maps of the GPVs for nine selected diseases.
settingAll primary healthcare facilities within the 105 townships or communities randomly selected from Anhui province, China.
participantsAll practising doctors working with and all patients presenting to the above sampled facilities during the 27-month study period.
resultsThe overall rate of primary healthcare visits during the 27-month period was estimated at 147.78%, with intra-regional variation coefficients by all-cause and system-specific disease ranging from 49.02% to 68.96%, and women were more likely than men to seek primary healthcare. The observed GPVs for all-cause and system-specific diseases all fitted very well with logarithmic equations and the goodness of fit increased rapidly when the months of EMRs were extended for the first few months, being over 78.92%, 91.17% and 94.78% for the first 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, respectively. These logarithmic models predicted at least high disparity (GPV>0.4) for all the system-specific diseases when the time period reached 6 months to 8 years. The observed GPVs for system-specific diseases, as estimated using the 27-month electronic medical records, ranged from 0.341 for skin-immune disease to 0.514 for cardiovascular disease. While the observed GPVs for all causes witnessed: great inter-region variations, with the highest GPV being 4.38 times the lowest; a general decreasing trend over the 9-quarter period, being reduced by 18.48% on average; and atypical J-shaped trajectories along age groups for both sexes. The multivariate modelling revealed statistically significant associations between the all-cause-GPV and 10 out of 14 commonly available community-level variables studied.
conclusionsGPVs can be accurately estimated using a limited number of months of EMRs and, guided by the relevant framework, analysis of GPVs can unveil useful clues in addressing unequal primary healthcare utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.