ArticleBMJ open2025
Eligibility for faricimab in a real-world diabetic macular oedema population: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress in the treatment of diabetic macular edema with faricimab: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the eligibility for faricimab in a real-world diabetic macular oedema (DMO) population to the YOSEMITE and RHINE trials, and to compare the eligible DMO populations to the trial populations. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND
participantsThis retrospective cross-sectional analysis used data from the Swedish Macula Registry (SMR) between 1 January 2019 and 31 August 2023. Eligibility criteria mirrored the main criteria of the YOSEMITE and RHINE trials: (1) DMO diagnosis, (2) treatment-naïve, (3) 18 years or older, (4) central retinal thickness (CRT) 325 µm or higher and (5) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranging from 25 to 73 letters. Individuals with registered proliferative diabetic retinopathy (DR) at the start of treatment were excluded. A secondary selection of eligible individuals was conducted using the same criteria, except for BCVA, which ranged from 25 to 77 letters according to national guidelines (treatment practice).
main outcome measuresCharacteristics at the initial visit of the two eligible SMR populations were compared with baseline data from the clinical trials, respectively.
resultsIn total, 3777 individuals with DMO were selected from SMR. Of these, 2357 (62.4%) individuals were treatment-naïve, all were 18 years or older, 1928 (51.0%) exhibited CRT≥325 µm, 1175 (31.1%) had 25-73 letters based on phase III studies, while 1528 (40.5%) had 25-77 letters according to treatment practice. After excluding individuals with registered proliferative DR 1171 (31.0%) individuals in the SMR met all criteria based on phase III studies, while 1522 (40.3%) individuals fulfilled the criteria according to treatment practice. The SMR and treatment practice populations were older (YOSEMITE 67.5±11.6 vs 62.8±10.0 years, p<0.001 and RHINE 67.5±11.6 vs 61.6±10.1 years, p<0.001) than those in the phase III studies and had lower CRT (YOSEMITE 446±96 vs 486±131 µm, p<0.001 and RHINE 446±96 vs 471±127 µm, p=0.001).
conclusionApproximately 30% of DMO patients in the SMR met the main trial criteria from YOSEMITE and RHINE, while around 40% met the criteria based on treatment practice. The SMR and treatment practice cohorts were older and had less severe DMO than the trial cohorts. Further research into the safety profile of faricimab in clinical settings is necessary, along with the consideration of additional eligibility criteria when implementing faricimab in ophthalmology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.