ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
The Effect of Electronic Health Record and Immunization Information System Interoperability on Medical Practice Vaccination Workflow.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- An exploratory study to determine the feasibility and processes needed to implement the Immunization Neighborhood to increase HPV vaccination among African American adolescents and adolescents in the general population: A multi-partner perspective.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Current Vaccination Principles and Practices in Adult Cancer Patients.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Review
- An Interoperable Vaccine Record: A Roadmap to Realization.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Vaccines for microbial eye diseases in the era of data science: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- How Immunization Information Systems Inform Age-Based HPV Vaccination Recommendations in the United States: A Mixed-Methods Study.Vaccines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInteroperability between electronic health records (EHR) and immunization information systems (IIS) may positively influence data quality, affecting timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of these data. However, the extent to which EHR/IIS interoperability may influence the day-to-day vaccination workflow and related recordkeeping tasks performed at medical practices is unclear.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess how EHR/IIS interoperability may influence the vaccination workflow at medical practices and to identify related impacts on clinical and administrative activities.
methodsWe identified practices (family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine, local health departments) from the Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR), the statewide IIS in Michigan, representing each of the three HL7 interoperability levels (non-HL7, unidirectional, bidirectional). We conducted semi-structured interviews to assess how practices interact with the MCIR throughout the vaccination workflow. Transcripts were reviewed and coded to characterize practices' use of EHRs, MCIR, and other related technologies across the vaccination workflow.
resultsPractices completed Phase 1 (
conclusionPractices employed both their EHRs and IIS throughout the entire vaccination workflow, although the use of each relied heavily on paper-based processes. While benefits of adopting EHR/IIS interoperability were reported by practices, this may require staff to learn and implement new workflow processes that can be time consuming and may introduce new challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.