ArticleThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2026
Clinical outcomes following elective lumbar spine surgery in patients living with dementia.
Article in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Propensity Scores for Observational Studies: Putting Real World Data and Experience to Good Use in Spine Research!Global spine journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background contextAs the population ages and surgical techniques improve, more elderly patients with dementia are being considered for treatment of spinal disorders. However, the combined impact of procedural intensity and anesthesia exposure can exacerbate surgical risks, leading to more complex recoveries and postoperative morbidity. PURPOSE: To compare postsurgical outcomes of patients living with dementia who received elective lumbar spine surgery with a comparable group of patients without dementia. STUDY DESIGN/
settingRetrospective analysis using national Medicare claims. PATIENT SAMPLE: We identified Medicare beneficiaries living with dementia who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery between 2017 and 2018. This cohort was compared to Medicare beneficiaries who received comparable surgeries but without a diagnosis of dementia. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was any adverse event (AAE) within 180 days of surgery, with postoperative intensive interventions considered in parallel with other clinical outcomes.
methodsWe employed inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounding. We compared outcomes between cohorts using adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) from Cox-proportional hazard models and Fine-and-gray models considering death as a competing risk.
resultsWe included 101,313 patients. Within 180 days of surgery, patients with dementia had an increased hazard of AAE than those without dementia (aHR 1.30; 95% CI 1.21,1.40). Patients with dementia also demonstrated a greater hazard of mortality (aHR 1.75, 95%CI 1.33, 2.29) and postoperative intensive interventions (aHR 1.64, 95% CI 1.08, 2.49) over the same time frame.
conclusionsWe found a significantly increased risk of adverse events among patients living with dementia undergoing lumbar spine surgery. We believe these risks were previously underappreciated because of the focus on urgent procedures (eg, hip and odontoid fractures) in prior research evaluating postoperative outcomes for patients with dementia. Our results suggest the need for greater caution when recommending elective, high-intensity, surgical interventions for patients living with dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.