ArticleBiological psychiatry2025
Identification and External Validation of a Problem Cannabis Risk Network.
Article in Biological psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Connectome-based substrates of emotional N-back performance in the adolescent brain cognitive development study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous structural brain signatures of methamphetamine and ketamine use disorders revealed by normative modeling.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Multivariate environmental exposures are reflected in whole-brain functional connectivity and cognition in youth.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Altered reward-related resting-state network properties in adolescent cannabis use and depression.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2026Article
- Task and Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modeling of Brain-Behavior Relationships in Developmental Cohorts.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Multivariate environmental exposures are reflected in whole-brain functional connectivity and cognition in youth.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCannabis use is common, particularly during emerging adulthood when brain development is ongoing, and its use is associated with harmful outcomes for a subset of people. An improved understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying risk for problem-level use is critical to facilitate the development of more effective prevention and treatment approaches.
methodsIn the current study, we applied a whole-brain, data-driven, machine learning approach to identify neural features predictive of problem-level cannabis use in a nonclinical sample of college students (n = 191, 58% female) based on reward task functional connectivity data. We further examined whether the identified network would generalize to predict cannabis use in an independent sample of European adolescents/emerging adults (n = 1320, 53% female), whether it would predict clinical characteristics among adults seeking treatment for cannabis use disorder (n = 33, 9% female), and whether it was specific for predicting cannabis versus alcohol use outcomes across datasets.
resultsResults demonstrated identification of a problem cannabis risk network, which generalized to predict cannabis use in an independent sample of adolescents and was linked to increased addiction severity and poorer treatment outcome in a third sample of treatment-seeking adults. Furthermore, the identified network was specific for predicting cannabis versus alcohol use outcomes across all 3 datasets.
conclusionsFindings provide insight into neural mechanisms of risk for problem-level cannabis use among adolescents/emerging adults. Future work is needed to assess whether targeting this network can improve prevention and treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.