ArticleChest2025
Trajectories of Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Results Over 2 Years in Independent Cohorts From China, South Africa, Tanzania, and the United States.
Article in Chest, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic, quantitative ESAT6-CFP10 skin test for tuberculosis risk prediction: a large-scale, multi-center, prospective cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Plasma protein biomarkers predictive of progression to active tuberculosis among close contacts of patients with tuberculosis.iScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an ongoing debate about whether clearance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection occurs and at what magnitude. Recent studies quantifying "uncertainty zones" of interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) provide a more stringent estimate of reversion. RESEARCH QUESTION: When accounting for uncertainty zones through stringent cutoffs, what are the trajectories of IGRAs results over 2 years of testing? STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsFive cohorts from South Africa, China, Tanzania, and the United States tested with an IGRA 3 or more times were followed up for stringent conversion and reversion. The annual risk of IGRA reversion was assessed following an IGRA conversion and among those with baseline positivity.
resultsA total of 26,596 IGRA measurements were taken over 13,593 years of follow-up (N
interpretationThese results suggest high annual rates of IGRA reversion, even with the use of uncertainty zones; reversion rates decreased over time from exposure and at older ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.