ArticleCurrent biology : CB2025
Eye saccades align optic flow with retinal specializations during object pursuit in freely moving ferrets.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Path integration from optic flow and the role of eye movements.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Foveated light-field compound imager.Science advances · 2026Article
- Heading and Then Saccades Predict Visual Discrimination Decisions in Freely Moving Ferrets.eNeuro · 2026Article
- Eye-head coordination during goal-directed orienting in mice.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Eye-head coordination during goal-directed orienting in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Foveated Light-Field Compound Imager.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A complete spatial map of mouse retinal ganglion cells reveals density and gene expression specializations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The impact of the serotonergic psychedelic DOI on active vision in freely moving mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During prey pursuit, how eye rotations, such as saccades, enable continuous tracking of erratically moving targets while enabling an animal to navigate through the environment is unknown. To better understand this, we measured head and eye rotations in freely running ferrets during pursuit behavior. By also tracking the target and all environmental features, we reconstructed the animal's visual fields and their relationship to retinal structures. In the reconstructed visual fields, the target position clustered on and around the high-acuity retinal area location, the area centralis, and surprisingly, this cluster was not significantly shifted by digital removal of either eye saccades, exclusively elicited when the ferrets made turns, or head rotations that were tightly synchronized with the saccades. Here, we show that, while the saccades did not fixate the moving target with the area centralis, they instead aligned the area centralis with the intended direction of travel. This also aligned the area centralis with features of the optic flow pattern, such as flow direction and focus of expansion, used for navigation by many species. While saccades initially rotated the eyes in the same direction as the head turn, saccades were followed by eye rotations countering the ongoing head rotation, which reduced image blur and limited information loss across the visual field during head turns. As we measured the same head and eye rotational relationship in freely moving tree shrews, rats, and mice, we suggest that these saccades and counter-rotations are a generalized mechanism enabling mammals to navigate complex environments during pursuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.