Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39909027›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2025

Improving Leadership Handling of Student Concerns about Faculty Benefits Both Students and Faculty.

John A Rankin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John A RankinDepartment of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-0949-6810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For centuries, students have had minimal power in the dynamic relationship with faculty. Understandably, then, students have been reluctant to express concerns about faculty behavior believed to be counterproductive to a safe and positive learning environment. In more recent times, medical students have increasingly been encouraged to voice concerns about faculty behavior that students believe is counterproductive. However, medical students frequently are not experienced in the expression of their concerns and are uncomfortable with and reluctant to engage in direct discussions with faculty. As medical schools continue to encourage students to express their concerns, they have an opportunity to teach students to voice these concerns productively, to help students overcome their inherent reluctance to deal directly with faculty, and thereby to teach critical conflict management skills that will serve students throughout their careers. I propose two actionable and specific ways medical schools can teach students and faculty alike to work together to their mutual benefit. The first is by requiring students to be actively involved in direct discussions with faculty when concerns are expressed, and the second is for faculty to be educated more comprehensively on how to handle emotionally and practically the expressions of student concerns. In this manner, medical schools foster the building of student conflict management skills that will benefit them throughout their careers. In addition, medical schools foster the building of bonds between students and patients, as well as faculty and colleagues, who may hold different viewpoints. Both students and faculty stand to benefit from implementing these strategies. Furthermore, this evens the power differential in the dynamics of their relationship by moving the power pendulum to the more equitable middle position.

Indexed as

Faculty, MedicalInterprofessional RelationsLeadershipStudents, MedicalHumansSchools, Medicalfacultyfaculty educationleadershipmedical educationmedical student feedback

Identifiers

PMID39909027
PMCPMC11984648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.