ArticleEarly human development2025
Clinical validation of an abridged AIMS: Streamlining motor screening in the first-year infant.
Article in Early human development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occupational therapists' perceptions of artificial intelligence: Potential, preparedness, and training needs.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study validates an abridged version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), termed the "salient set," to streamline infant screening using video analysis and machine learning. Twenty-one retrospective infant videos were manually tagged by trained occupational therapists using only the 15-item salient set with support vector regressors (SVRs) trained on a larger sample (n = 102) predicting the true (full) AIMS score. The SVR demonstrated strong concurrent validity of the salient set with the full 58-item AIMS (Pearson correlation: 0.99). The abridged set showed high screening sensitivity (1.0) and specificity (0.895), while reducing evaluation time by 67 %. The salient set offers a useful contribution to machine learning by detecting an abridged set of items while still accurately and appropriately identifying infants for EI referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.