ArticleVaccine2025
Exploring bias due to below-limit-of-detection values in influenza vaccine antibody modeling: A case study and instructional guide for the CIVIC study.
Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Mechanisms of Alkaloids Against Enterovirus A71: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Evidence Integrated with Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many laboratory assay datasets, missing values due to a limit of detection (LOD) are not uncommon. We observed this issue in our CIVIC-UGAFLUVAC hemagglutination inhibition assay (HAI) dataset. The standard imputation method recodes these values as either equal to the LOD or LOD/2. However, ignoring censoring can lead to falsely significant results in research. In this study, we explored the bias in modeling vaccine HAI titer increase. Moreover, we modified the titer increase modeling within the interval censoring framework to adjust for bias in parameter estimates. Our method provided less biased results compared to the standard imputation method. We anticipate that this study will serve as a case study and instructional guide for future vaccine research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.