ArticleBlood advances2025
Allogeneic off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01430390 (A Phase I Trial Using In Vitro Expanded Allogeneic Epstein-Barr Virus Specific Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Trial Using In Vitro Expanded Allogeneic Epstein-Barr Virus Specific Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) Genetically Targeted to the CD19 Antigen in B-cell Malignancies
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- The TCR in CAR T cell therapy: use it or lose it?Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells in Myasthenia Gravis: Advances, Safety Challenges, and Future Directions.Muscle & nerve · 2026Review
- Challenges and advances in CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- CAR T-cells in hematologic malignancies: Advances, challenges, and future directions.iScience · 2026Review
- Beyond autologousMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Targeting metabolic reprogramming to enhance adoptive immunotherapy: emerging mechanisms and translational perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Human pluripotent stem cell-derived innate and adaptive immune cells for cancer immunotherapy.Cell stem cell · 2026Review
- The trinity of T cell engagement: navigating the molecular and clinical landscape of CAR-T, TILs, and TCEs in the war against cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Breaking the resistance barrier: synergistic evolution of CAR-T cells and bispecific antibodies in the era of precision immuno-oncology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Recent advances in universal chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Article
- Unconventional Immunotherapies in Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- How to democratize cell and gene therapy: A global approach.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Universal CAR-T Cell Therapy for Cancer Treatment: Advances and Challenges.Oncology research · 2025Review
- New insights on potency assays from recent advances and discoveries in CAR T-cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Universal CAR cell therapy: Challenges and expanding applications.Translational oncology · 2025Review
- Off-the-shelf CAR-T cell therapies for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: latest update from ASH 2023 annual meeting.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Article
- "Off-The-Shelf" allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for B-cell malignancies: current clinical evidence and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Autologous stem cell transplantation meets CAR-T therapy: A synergistic strategy for B-cell lymphoma.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractDespite clinical benefit with the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, the need to manufacture patient-specific products limits its clinical utility. To overcome this barrier, we developed an allogeneic "off-the-shelf" CAR T-cell product using Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific T cells (EBV-VSTs) genetically modified with a CD19-specific CAR (19-28z). Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell malignancies were stratified into 3 treatment cohorts: cohort 1 (n = 8; disease recurrence after allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation [HCT]), cohort 2 (n = 6; consolidative therapy after autologous HCT), or cohort 3 (n = 2; consolidative therapy after allogeneic HCT). The primary objective of this trial was to determine the safety of multiple CAR EBV-VST infusions. Most patients (n = 12/16) received multiple doses (overall median, 2.5 [range, 1-3]) with 3 × 106 T cells per kg determined to be the optimal dose enabling multiple treatments per manufactured cell line. Severe cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity did not occur after infusion, and no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the trial. Median follow-up was 48 months (range, 4-135) with 4 deaths due to disease progression. Overall survival of all patients was 81% at 12 months and 75% at 36 months. Postinfusion expansion and persistence were limited, and CAR EBV-VSTs demonstrated a unique T-cell phenotype compared with autologous 19-28z CAR T cells. Our study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of an allogeneic "off-the-shelf" CAR EBV-VST product with favorable outcomes for patients with CD19+ R/R B-cell malignancies. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT01430390.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.