Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39908459›Full record

ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2025

Advancing periodontal diagnosis: harnessing advanced artificial intelligence for patterns of periodontal bone loss in cone-beam computed tomography.

Sevda Kurt-Bayrakdar, İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar, Alican Kuran, Özer Çelik, Kaan Orhan, Rohan Jagtap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sevda Kurt-BayrakdarDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, 26240, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3711-6520
İbrahim Şevki BayrakdarDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Care Planning and Restorative Sciences, University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Dentistry, Jackson, MS, 39216, United States.
Alican KuranDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, 41190, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-9677-8690
Özer ÇelikDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, 26240, Turkey.
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, 06560, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6768-0176
Rohan JagtapDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Care Planning and Restorative Sciences, University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Dentistry, Jackson, MS, 39216, United States.

Funding

BIDEP 2219 International Post-Doctoral Research 1059B192101048Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe current study aimed to automatically detect tooth presence, tooth numbering, and types of periodontal bone defects from cone-beam CT (CBCT) images using a segmentation method with an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm.

methodsThis study utilized a dataset of CBCT volumes collected from 502 individual subjects. Initially, 250 CBCT volumes were used for automatic tooth segmentation and numbering. Subsequently, CBCT volumes from 251 patients diagnosed with periodontal disease were employed to train an AI system to identify various periodontal bone defects using a segmentation method in web-based labelling software. In the third stage, CBCT images from 251 periodontally healthy subjects were combined with images from 251 periodontally diseased subjects to develop an AI model capable of automatically classifying patients as either periodontally healthy or periodontally diseased. Statistical evaluation included receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and confusion matrix model.

resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for the models developed to segment teeth, total alveolar bone loss, supra-bony defects, infra-bony defects, perio-endo lesions, buccal defects, and furcation defects were 0.9594, 0.8499, 0.5052, 0.5613 (with cropping, AUC: 0.7488), 0.8893, 0.6780 (with cropping, AUC: 0.7592), and 0.6332 (with cropping, AUC: 0.8087), respectively. Additionally, the classification CNN model achieved an accuracy of 80% for healthy individuals and 76% for unhealthy individuals.

conclusionsThis study employed AI models on CBCT images to automatically detect tooth presence, numbering, and various periodontal bone defects, achieving high accuracy and demonstrating potential for enhancing dental diagnostics and patient care.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossArtificial IntelligenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyPeriodontal DiseasesAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedartificial intelligenceCBCT imagesperiodontal bone defectstooth numberingtooth segmentation

Identifiers

PMID39908459
PMCPMC12038236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.