Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39908407›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Acute Effects of Nicotine on Non-Drug-Related Reward in Smokers and Non-Smokers.

Nicola Rycroft, Catherine Kimber, Emke S E Brazier, Lynne Dawkins

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicola RycroftNicotine, Tobacco and Vaping Research Group, Division of Psychology, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK.ORCID 0009-0009-1249-0434
Catherine KimberNicotine, Tobacco and Vaping Research Group, Division of Psychology, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9994-8640
Emke S E BrazierNicotine, Tobacco and Vaping Research Group, Division of Psychology, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK.
Lynne DawkinsNicotine, Tobacco and Vaping Research Group, Division of Psychology, London South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 0AA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1236-009X

Funding

Centre for Addictive Behaviours ResearchLondon South Bank University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNicotine increases the reward value of non-drug-related stimuli in animals and dependent smokers; however, research on people who are not dependent on nicotine is limited. This study aimed to explore whether nicotine delivered by oral spray can enhance responding to self-selected sensory rewards in both smokers and non-smokers. AIMS AND

methodsMinimally abstinent smokers (n = 30) and non-smokers (n = 31) completed subjective ratings of nicotine withdrawal, and received either 2 mg nicotine or placebo oral spray and visual analogue scales to measure the perceived effects of the spray. An operant conditioning task (Applepicker) that required button clicks to find apples was completed twice, with and without a reward of 30 seconds of pre-prepared music for each reinforcer earned. Measures taken were the number of apples found (reinforcers), number of clicks (responses), and time spent on the task (in seconds).

resultsThere were no differences between smokers and non-smokers on ratings of nicotine withdrawal or effects of the spray. All participants spent longer searching for apples, earned more reinforcers, and produced more responses when listening to music. Nicotine administration led to a higher number of reinforcers earned and, when music was playing, an increase in a number of responses. A three-way interaction revealed that non-smokers who had received nicotine spent the longest searching for apples.

conclusionsNicotinic enhancement of sensory rewards was seen in non-smokers only which cannot be accounted for by learned associations with nicotine or reversal of withdrawal effects. Smokers, however, may require higher doses of nicotine to achieve the same effect. IMPLICATIONS: Nicotinic enhancement of sensory rewards was demonstrated in non-smokers, but not in everyday smokers, suggesting it is unlikely to be related to nicotine dependence or learned associations between nicotine and pleasure. The absence of this effect in smokers suggests that higher levels of nicotine than those obtained from 2 mg oral sprays may be required to achieve enhancement of reward in people who regularly consume nicotine. For nicotine replacement (including e-cigarettes) to become more effective at reducing anhedonia during quit attempts, smokers may require nicotine doses that more closely replicate levels achieved through smoking.

Indexed as

NicotineNon-SmokersRewardSmokersAdultConditioning, OperantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID39908407
PMCPMC12012236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.