Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39908311›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Pathways and processes to adopting or switching to a single-dose HPV vaccination schedule in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study.

Sunny Roy, Megan D Wysong, Erica N Rosser, Ishani Sheth, Casey Geddes, Rupali J Limaye, Joseph G Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sunny RoyDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1693-4471
Megan D WysongDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Erica N RosserDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3893-869X
Ishani ShethDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Casey GeddesDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Rupali J LimayeDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Joseph G RosenDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4991-4033

Funding

The Brown Initiative in HIV and AIDS Clinical Research for Minority CommunitiesR25MH083620 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI NUNN, AMY STEWART · 2008 to 2025
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH083620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently endorsed a single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination (HPVV) schedule, but adoption of the revised immunization schedule has not been uniform, notably in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with outsized cervical cancer burdens. We sought to characterize the sequence of events, as well as actors/institutions involved, that facilitate or impede country-level decision-making related to the HPVV schedule. From September 2023 to February 2024, we conducted 66 semi-structured interviews with national immunization stakeholders from 19 LMICs in Africa and Asia, sampled purposively by the maturity of the HPVV program and HPVV schedule. Using purposive text analysis to synthesize emerging insights from interviews, we qualitatively discerned a sequence of decision-making pathways and processes, including actors involved at each stage of the decision-making continuum, related to adoption or switch to an HPVV single-dose schedule. We identified six key sequential steps LMICs follow when deciding on an HPV dosing schedule. Firstly, the new recommendation emerges where WHO and the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) release new HPV vaccine recommendations. Second, the information is shared with the Ministry of Health (MoH) and Expanded Programme for Immunization (EPI). The MoH is informed, and they convene a National Immunization Technical Advisory Group (NITAG) to assess the new HPV vaccine schedule recommendation. Third, there is the review and consideration of evidence. The NITAG reviews evidence on factors like cost-effectiveness, supply chain, disease burden, and anticipated vaccine hesitancy. Fourth, the NITAG deliberates, achieves consensus, and submits a recommendation to the MoH, which endorses the NITAG's recommendation or requests additional evidence/information before rendering a final decision on the immunization schedule. Fifth and finally, the Interagency Coordination Committee (ICC) reviews the MoH's recommendation and provides final authorization before changes to the HPV immunization schedule is communicated to Gavi.

Identifiers

PMID39908311
PMCPMC11798430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.