Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39908304›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Perceptions of a Buruli ulcer controlled human infection model: How, who, and why?

Stephen Muhi, Simone Schmidt, Julia L Marshall, Daniel P O'Brien, Paul D R Johnson, James S McCarthy, Euzebiusz Jamrozik, Joshua Osowicki, Timothy P Stinear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stephen MuhiDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-8199
Simone SchmidtFaculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Julia L MarshallDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel P O'BrienVictorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Paul D R JohnsonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James S McCarthyVictorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Euzebiusz JamrozikDepartment of General Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Joshua OsowickiTropical Diseases Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Timothy P StinearDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection with Mycobacterium ulcerans causes slowly progressive skin lesions known as Buruli ulcer (BU). An M. ulcerans controlled human infection model (MuCHIM) is likely to accelerate our understanding of this otherwise neglected disease, and may be an efficient platform for testing vaccines and other interventions. The aim of this study was to understand perceptions of this model across a range of key stakeholders in an endemic Australian community setting.

methodsWe recruited young adults who live near an Australian BU endemic area but without a personal history of BU, clinicians involved in the management of BU, young adults with a personal history of a small, treated BU, and participants of any age with a demonstrated interest in public advocacy related to their personal BU lived experience. Participants reviewed an abridged version of the provisional protocol. A series of three focus groups were then conducted by video, and the transcribed text was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes for exploration.

resultsParticipants universally valued the outcomes that MuCHIM might deliver. The predominant theme was that informed consent required fully transparent communication with potential participants regarding what their participation would involve, how it would impact their lives, and both the expected outcome and 'worst-case scenario'. They also offered actionable recommendations on how best to communicate the tension between the expected outcome and the 'worst-case scenario' of disease associated with delayed diagnosis and comorbidity, as typically portrayed by the media. Participants recommended including images and testimonials from people who have had BU to support the conditions for informed consent. Focus groups also gave a clear sense of who they believed would volunteer for this type of research.

conclusionsThis study offers valuable guidance regarding the content and presentation of information to inform potential participants, with focus group participants suggesting a multimodal approach of communication, including lived experience testimonials and clinical images of the expected outcome. This information will inform development of materials for enrolment to adequately communicate risks and expectations to potential study participants.

Indexed as

Buruli UlcerMycobacterium ulceransAdolescentAdultAustraliaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39908304
PMCPMC11819514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.