ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Children's digital privacy on fast-food and dine-in restaurant mobile applications.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Examining Canadian youth's engagement with food companies via digital media.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children are targeted by unhealthy food marketing on digital media, influencing their food preferences, intakes and non-communicable disease risk. Restaurant mobile applications are powerful platforms for collecting users' data and are popular among children. This study aimed to provide insight into the privacy policies of top dine-in and fast-food mobile apps in Canada and data collected on child users. Privacy policies of the top 30 fast-food and dine-in restaurants in Canada were reviewed. A convenience sample of 11 English-speaking Canadian residents aged 9-12 years with fast-food apps on their mobile phones were recruited to use ≥1 fast-food restaurant mobile app(s). Children used the app(s) for 5-10 minutes and placed food orders. Parents submitted a Data Access Request (DAR) on their child's behalf to the food company. Descriptive analysis and a flexible deductive approach to content analysis evaluated data collected through DARs. Overall, 26 privacy policies were analyzed. The intended age of app users was indicated by 12 (46%) food companies, 10 (39%) of which specified it as ≥13 years. No company had a compulsory age verification process. Twenty-four (92%) companies disclosed the data collected on app users: 23 (89%) did not distinguish between information pertaining to children or adults, and 21 (81%) described a protocol for action if they inadvertently collected data on children. Twenty-four DARs were sent to companies; 11 (45.8%) of which were fulfilled by companies, and 4 (16.7%) resulted in the receipt of children's data. All responding food companies were found to collect sociodemographic information on child participants (e.g., name, email). Some collected other information, such as order details and available promotional offers. This study demonstrates current fast-food and dine-in restaurant privacy policies are insufficient and provides insight into data collected on children via fast-food apps. Policies must be strengthened to ensure children's privacy and protection online.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.