Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39908294›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Microbubble dynamics in brain microvessels.

James H Bezer, Paul Prentice, William Lim Kee Chang, Sophie V Morse, Kirsten Christensen-Jeffries, Christopher J Rowlands, Andriy S Kozlov, James J Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Tetrazine-Inorganic chemistry frontiers · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James H BezerDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1467-7106
Paul PrenticeSchool of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
William Lim Kee ChangDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sophie V MorseDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kirsten Christensen-JeffriesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher J RowlandsDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andriy S KozlovDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
James J ChoiDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4850-8204

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused ultrasound stimulation of microbubbles is being tested in clinical trials for its ability to deliver drugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This technique has the potential to treat neurological diseases by preferentially delivering drugs to targeted regions. Yet despite its potential, the physical mechanisms by which microbubbles alter the BBB permeability remain unclear, as direct observations of microbubbles oscillating in brain microvessels have never been previously recorded. The purpose of this study was to reveal how microbubbles respond to ultrasound when within the microvessels of living brain tissue. Microbubbles in acute brain slices acquired from juvenile rats perfused with a concentrated solution of SonoVue® and dye were exposed to ultrasound pulses typically used in BBB disruption (center frequency: 1 MHz, peak-negative pressure: 0.2-1 MPa, pulse length: up to 10 ms) and observed using high-speed microscopy at up to 10 million frames per second. We observed that microbubbles can exert mechanical stresses on a wide region of tissue beyond their initial location and immediate surroundings. A single microbubble can apply mechanical stress to parenchymal tissues several micrometers away from the vessel. Microbubbles can travel at high velocities within the microvessels, extending their influence across tens of micrometers during a single pulse. With longer pulses and higher pressures, microbubbles could penetrate the vessel wall and move through the parenchyma. The probability of extravasation scales approximately with mechanical index, being rare at low pressures, but much more common at a mechanical index ≥ 0.6. These results present the first direct observations of ultrasound-driven microbubbles within brain tissue, and illustrate a range of microbubble behaviors that have the potential to lead to safe drug delivery or tissue damage.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrainMicrobubblesMicrovesselsAnimalsMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyUltrasonic Waves

Identifiers

PMID39908294
PMCPMC11798480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.