ArticlePloS one2025
Host plants selection of Centranthera grandiflora Benth. and nontargeted metabolomics analysis of its parasitic and non-parasitic samples.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the previous investigation and research of our group, it was found that Centranthera grandiflora Benth. (C. grandiflora for short) might be a root hemiparasitic plant. The experiments of mixed sowing of C. grandiflora and 9 companion plants that might be hosts were conducted, and the growth, biological yield and other indexes were observed. The results showed that Cyperus iria L. was the best host for C. grandiflora, and when they were mixed sowed, C. grandiflora had a vigorous growth above ground and the haustoria connected obviously below ground, while C. grandiflora could achieve blossoming and fruiting in the same year. Next, nontargeted metabonomics analysis methods were utilized to clarify the differences in metabolites between parasitized and non-parasitized C. grandiflora. A total of 82 metabolites with significant differences were screened. The main upregulated differential metabolites of non-parasitized plants were for plant growth, while that of parasitized plants were functional compounds such as EPA. Out of 82 differential metabolites, 32 were annotated into 37 KEGG pathways. Analysis of the 37 pathways in combination with the differential metabolites showed that in addition to being involved in the synthesis pathway of iridoid terpenes, the up-regulated metabolites of parasitized plants were involved in the synthesis pathways of several functional components, while that of non-parasitic plants were involved in the subsequent catabolism of monoterpenoid compounds, as well as the metabolic pathways of nutrients synthesis and catabolism, energy generation, and phytohormone production required for plant growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.