ArticlePloS one2025
Federated learning based reference evapotranspiration estimation for distributed crop fields.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water resource management and sustainable agriculture rely heavily on accurate Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo). Efforts have been made to simplify the (ETo) estimation using machine learning models. The existing approaches are limited to a single specific area. There is a need for ETo estimations of multiple locations with diverse weather conditions. The study intends to propose ETo estimation of multiple locations with distinct weather conditions using a federated learning approach. Traditional centralized approaches require aggregating all data in one place, which can be problematic due to privacy concerns and data transfer limitations. However, federated learning trains models locally and combines the knowledge, resulting in more generalized ETo estimates across different regions. The three geographical locations of Pakistan, each with diverse weather conditions, are selected to implement the proposed model using the weather data from 2012 to 2022 of the selected three locations. At each selected location, three machine learning models named Random Forest Regressor (RFR), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), and Decision Tree Regressor (DTR), are evaluated for local Evapotranspiration (ET) estimation and the federated global model. The feature importance-based analysis is also performed to assess the impacts of weather parameters on machine learning performance at each selected local location. The evaluation reveals that Random Forest Regressor (RFR) based federated learning outperformed other models with coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.97%, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 0.44, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) = 0.33 mm day-1, and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) = 8.18%. The Random Forest Regressor (RFR) performance yields the local machine learning models against each selected site. The analysis results suggest that maximum temperature and wind speed are the most influential factors in Evapotranspiration (ET) predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.