ArticleAging and disease2025
Anti-Müllerian Hormone Concentrations in Women of Different Reproductive Age and the Chances of IVF Outcome: A Paradigm Shift is needed.
Article in Aging and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel multi-omic biomarkers to combat oocyte and ovarian aging.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Oocyte aging in focus: Environmental and endogenous stressors driving reproductive potential decline.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Gestational exposure to the artificial sweetener erythritol reprograms ovarian function through AMH suppression and oxidative stress-mediated disruption of autophagy and PI3K signaling.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Success Rates of Assisted Reproduction in Couples with Poor Ovarian Response and Oligospermia.Cells · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) has garnered considerable attention due to its critical implications in assessing and understanding both female and male fertility potential. Traditionally, AMH is recognized for its pivotal role in evaluating ovarian reserve and is a cornerstone in reproductive health assessments for women. The aim of this study was to challenge the traditional interpretation of AMH as a standalone predictor of IVF success. Through a retrospective analysis of 600 patients undergoing ICSI, we reveal that women with low AMH levels, traditionally classified as poor responders, can achieve unexpectedly high oocyte numbers, blastocyst formation, and pregnancy rates. This highlights the limitations of using AMH alone to predict IVF outcomes. Our findings advocate the importance of integrating additional factors, such as follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and the need for a more individualized approach to fertility treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.