Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39908092›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Nurses' Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed-Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study.

Stefan Walzer, Isabel Schön, Johanna Pfeil, Sam Klemm, Sven Ziegler, Claudia Schmoor, Christophe Kunze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefan WalzerCare and Technology Lab, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen im Schwarzwald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8748-5244
Isabel SchönAGP Social Research, FIVE e.V., Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-7089-650X
Johanna PfeilAGP Social Research, FIVE e.V., Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-2721-8425
Sam KlemmCenter of Implementing Nursing Care Innovations Freiburg, Nursing Direction, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-0676-2896
Sven ZieglerCenter of Implementing Nursing Care Innovations Freiburg, Nursing Direction, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1932-0787
Claudia SchmoorClinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5610-9425
Christophe KunzeCare and Technology Lab, Furtwangen University, Furtwangen im Schwarzwald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2238-5533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnology that detects early when a patient at risk of falling leaves the bed can support nurses in acute care hospitals.

objectiveTo develop a better understanding of nurses' perspectives and experiences with a bed-exit information system (BES) in an acute care hospital setting.

methodsBES was implemented on 3 wards of a university medical center. Nurses completed 2 online surveys at each time point (P0 and P1) and participated in focus groups before (P0) and after (P1) implementation. Additional patient data were collected. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, while content analysis was applied to focus group data. Patient rates and adverse events in both phases were compared using negative binomial models. Reporting of this study adhered to the GRAMMS checklist.

resultsA total of 30 questionnaires were completed at P0 (30/72, 42%) and 24 at P1 (24/71, 33%). Of the participants, 15 completed both questionnaires (complete cases). At P1, 64% (9/14) of participants agreed that their perceived workload and strain in caring for patients with cognitive impairment was reduced by the use of the BES. The adverse event rate per patient per day was reduced by a factor of 0.61 (95% CI 0.393-0.955; P=.03). In addition, 11 nurses participated in 4 focus groups before and after the intervention. Participants found it challenging to operationalize the use of the BES due to the heterogeneity of care settings, but certain behaviors of patients with cognitive impairment were recognized as indicating a need for intervention. Negative experiences included information overload and alarm fatigue, leading to occasional removal of the system.

conclusionsWhile BES provides some support in managing patients with cognitive impairment, its impact remains limited to specific scenarios and does not significantly reduce nurses' workload or strain. Our findings highlight the need to manage expectations of BES performance to ensure alignment between expected and actual benefits. To improve BES effectiveness and long-term implementation, future research should consider both objective measures of patient care and subjective factors such as nurse experience, structural conditions, and technical specifications. Improving information mechanisms within call systems could help reduce alarm fatigue and increase perceived usefulness. Overall, successful integration of BES in acute care settings will require close collaboration with nursing staff to drive meaningful healthcare innovation and ensure that the technology meets the needs of both patients and nurses.

trial registrationGerman Register for Clinical Studies DRKS00021720; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00021720.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNursesNursing Staff, HospitalAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkloadacute hospitalbed-exitcognitive impairmentcognitively impairedfall preventionhospitalinformation systeminpatientmixed methodsnurseonline questionnairesupporttechnologyworkload

Identifiers

PMID39908092
PMCPMC11840387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.