Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39908017›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Socioeconomic and Geographic Differences in Mammography Trends Following the 2009 USPSTF Policy Update.

Jason Semprini, Loren Saulsberry, Olufunmilayo I Olopade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Individual-Level Trends in Mammography Screening over 14 years: Results from an All-Payer Statewide Claims Database.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason SempriniDepartment of Public Health, Des Moines University College of Health Sciences, West Des Moines, Iowa.
Loren SaulsberryDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Olufunmilayo I OlopadeSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: In 2024, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) reversed a 2009 policy recommending only females aged 50 to 74 years complete a biennial mammogram. Understanding whether females facing heterogeneous breast cancer risks responded to the 2009 guidance may illuminate how they may respond to the latest policy update. Objective: To evaluate whether the 2009 policy was associated with changes in mammography screening in females no longer recommended to complete a biennial mammogram and whether these changes varied by factors associated with breast cancer risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: The difference-in-differences design compared biennial mammogram trends in the exposed groups (aged 40-49 and ≥75 years) with trends of the unexposed groups (aged 50-64 and 65-74 years), before and after the 2009 update. Population-based, repeated cross-sectional survey data came from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) biennial cancer screening module (2000-2018). The sample was restricted to females between ages 40 and 84 years. Data were analyzed from March 1 to June 30, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was a binary variable indicating whether the respondent reported a mammogram in the past 2 years (biennial). After 2009, females aged 40 to 49 and 75 or older years were exposed to the policy update, as a complete biennial mammogram was recommended. Subgroup analyses included race and ethnicity, educational level, household income, smoking history, current binge drinking status, and state of residence. Results: The sample included 1 594 834 females; 75% reported a biennial mammogram. In those aged 40 to 49 years, the USPSTF update was associated with a 1.1 percentage-point (95% CI, -1.8% to -0.3 percentage points) decrease in the probability of a biennial mammogram, with the largest decreases in the non-Hispanic Black population (-3.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.5% to -0.5 percentage points). In the aged 75 years or older group, the USPSTF update was associated with a 4.8 percentage-point decrease (95% CI, -6.3% to -3.5 percentage points) in the probability of a biennial mammogram, with significant heterogeneity by race and ethnicity, binge drinking status, and state residence. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, socioeconomic factors were associated with differences in how females responded to the 2009 USPSTF mammography recommendation. Whether the 2024 update considered such differences is unclear. These findings suggest that including risk assessment into future USPSTF policy updates may improve adoption of risk-reducing interventions and shorten the time to diagnosis and treatment for high-risk patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealth PolicyMammographyMass ScreeningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39908017
PMCPMC11800017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.