ArticleEJNMMI physics2025
Low-activity [
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correlation of [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- High-contrast somatostatin receptor imaging of meningiomas with [¹⁸F]SiTATE PET/CT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Beyond image quality: Patient experience with long-axial field-of-view and standard PET/CT systems.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- PET-imaging derived prognostic factors for prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases receiving [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Continuous bed motion versus step-and-shoot acquisition in LAFOV PET/CT: insights from multi-phantom and patient studies.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Head to head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Cardiac Metastases in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose
methodsTwenty-four patients with histologically confirmed neuroendocrine tumor, who underwent clinically indicated [
resultsSubjective image quality decreased with simulated reduction of injected activity with generally superior ratings in the UHS mode compared to the HS mode. Despite a reduction to 1 MBq/kg of [
conclusionReducing the administered activity of injected [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.