ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Dual-Time-Point Radiomics for Prognosis Prediction in Colorectal Liver Metastasis Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy Before Radical Resection: A Two-Center Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptimal prognostic stratification for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients undergoing surgery with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains elusive. This study aimed to develop and validate dual-time-point radiomic models for CRLM prognosis prediction using pre- and post-NAT imaging features.
methodsRadiomic features were extracted from four MRI sequences in 100 cases of CRLM patients who underwent NAT and radical resection. RAD scores were generated, and clinical/pathologic variables were incorporated into uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses to construct prognosis models. Time-ROC, time-C index, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves assessed the predictive performance of Fong score and pre- and post-NAT models for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a testing set.
resultsThe final models included four variables for OS and three variables for DFS. The post-NAT models outperformed the pre-NAT models in time-ROC, time-C index, calibration, and DCA analysis, except for the 1-year DFS area under the curve (AUC). The Fong score models underperformed. The post-NAT OS RAD score effectively stratified patients into prognostic subgroups.
conclusionsThe radiomic models incorporating pre- and post-NAT MRI features and clinical/pathologic variables effectively stratified CRLM patients prognositically. The post-NAT models demonstrated superior performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39907877What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.