Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907863›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of clinical oncology2025

Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in era of multidisciplinary strategies.

Takeshi Takamoto, Yuichirou Mihara, Yujirou Nishioka, Akihiko Ichida, Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Kiyoshi Hasegawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takeshi TakamotoHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0455-6412
Yuichirou MiharaHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yujirou NishiokaHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiko IchidaHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshikuni KawaguchiHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhisa AkamatsuHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kiyoshi HasegawaHepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Artificial Organ and Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. hasegawa-2su@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant global health challenge, with over 800,000 new cases diagnosed annually. This comprehensive review examines current surgical approaches and emerging multidisciplinary strategies in HCC treatment. While traditional surgical criteria, such as the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, have been relatively conservative, recent evidence from high-volume Asian centers supports more aggressive surgical approaches in carefully selected patients. The review discusses the evolution of selection criteria, including the new "Borderline Resectable HCC" classification system, which provides more explicit guidance for surgical decision-making. Technical innovations have significantly enhanced surgical precision, including three-dimensional simulation, intraoperative navigation systems, and the advancement of minimally invasive approaches. The review evaluates the ongoing debate between anatomical versus non-anatomical resection and examines the emerging role of robotic surgery. In liver transplantation, expanded criteria beyond the Milan criteria show promising outcomes, while the integration of novel biomarkers and imaging techniques improves patient selection. The role of preoperative and adjuvant therapies is increasingly important, with recent trials demonstrating the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-VEGF agents in both settings. Despite these advances, postoperative recurrence remains a significant challenge. The review concludes that successful HCC treatment requires a personalized approach, integrating surgical expertise with emerging technologies and systemic therapies while considering individual patient factors and regional variations in practice patterns.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularHepatectomyLiver NeoplasmsHumansLiver TransplantationPatient SelectionRobotic Surgical ProceduresHepatocellular carcinomaImmunotherapyLiver surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39907863
PMCPMC11842484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.