ArticleLasers in medical science2025
In vitro study of the effects of diode laser on dentin hypersensitivity and evaluation of intra-pulpal temperature variation.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrapulpal thermal variation in standalone and dentifrice-assisted laser desensitisation at two time intervals.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Diode Laser Irradiation for Cavity Decontamination: A Pilot In Vitro Study on Antimicrobial Efficacy.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- One-Year Clinical Performance of Injectable and Paste-Type Composite Resins in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions Prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG Laser and Acid Etching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of nano-hydroxyapatite dentifrice, diode laser alone and combined for dentin hypersensitivity: A randomized clinical trial.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Effect of diode laser power settings on calcium loss in acid-eroded dentin: an in-vitro analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different wavelengths of high-power diode lasers for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity by analyzing morphological changes and temperature variation. Human third molars were irradiated with five different commercially available lasers at wavelengths of 808 nm, 940 nm, 976 nm, and 980 nm, both with and without the use of a photoinitiator (activated charcoal). Temperature variations were monitored using thermocouples, and morphological changes were assessed through scanning electron microscopy. Lasers with wavelengths of 940 nm, 976 nm, and 980 nm, used without a photoinitiator, promoted dentinal tubule obliteration without causing thermal damage. Lasers with wavelengths of 808 nm, 940 nm, 976 nm, and 980 nm, when combined with a photoinitiator, resulted in even lower temperature variation compared to the non-photoinitiator groups, although no regular fused surface was observed. Diode laser parameters, except Group 1(808 nm without photoinitiator), are potentially safe for dentinal tubule obliteration. The use of a photoinitiator continues to be an effective strategy for minimizing temperature variations during irradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39907815What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.