ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Clinical efficacy of the fractional ablative CO
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depressed scars, which are unsightly outcomes of trauma or skin lesions, can lead to significant physical and mental stress. Various treatments have been developed to alleviate these burdens, among which the laser stacking method has proven effective. In this study, we compared the outcomes of laser stacking treatments with those of single-pulse ablative laser treatments for depressed scars. Eighty patients with depressed scars were divided into two therapeutic groups: the ablative laser stacking therapy group (Group 1, n = 40) and the single pulse ablative laser therapy group (Group 2, n = 40). The scars were evaluated using the modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) before and after treatment. Patient-completed questionnaires were also utilized. Comparative analyses were conducted both before and after treatment, as well as between the two groups. Eighty scars from each patient underwent the complete laser treatment protocols. Group 1 showed significantly greater improvement in the mVSS indices for pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and height than group 2 (P < 0.05). In terms of patient-reported outcomes, group 1 rated better than group 2 across three indices: appearance, alleviation of concavity, and overall improvement (P < 0.05). Ablative laser stacking therapy effectively alleviated depressed scars, demonstrating significant improvement in both observer- and patient-reported outcomes. An energy level of 20-30 mJ was employed, resulting in more favorable outcomes compared to a single pulse laser application of 10-15 mJ. Our findings highlight the benefits of the stacking method, which shows notable improvements while minimizing complications. Further research involving various protocols may optimize clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39907810What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.