ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Reaction time distribution analysis of bimanual movements with spatial and symbolic cues.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The movement preparation of bimanual asymmetric reaching movements is longer than bimanual symmetric movements. This bimanual asymmetric cost is small for spatially cued movements and large with symbolic cues. Previous research on these bimanual asymmetric costs has relied on mean reaction time. The goal of the present study was to better understand the sensorimotor mechanisms of spatially and symbolically cued bimanual asymmetric costs by employing reaction time distribution analysis. Reaction time distributions were described with the ex-Gaussian parameters of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text]. Forty-eight young adults made bimanual symmetric and asymmetric reaching movements that were spatially or symbolically cued. With spatial cues, there was a small cost to [Formula: see text] for bimanual asymmetric movements compared to symmetric ones. This was depicted as a 4.8 ms rightward shift to the reaction time distribution. The bimanual asymmetric cost with spatial cues is likely caused by the temporal coupling of bimanual asymmetric movements. With symbolic cues, there was a large cost to [Formula: see text] and small costs to [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. This was depicted as the Gaussian and exponential components of the distribution having longer and more disperse reaction time for asymmetric movements. The bimanual asymmetric cost with symbolic cues is likely caused by two factors: stimulus-response translation of two different symbolic cues and temporal coupling of bimanual asymmetric movements. The bimanual asymmetric cost to µ with symbolic cues is likely a combination of both factors, with stimulus-response translation contributing more than temporal coupling. The bimanual asymmetric costs to σ and τ are exclusively caused by stimulus-response translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39907809What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.