SynthesisNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
The efficacy and safety of current treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Synthesis in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antifungal Resistance of Candida spp. Isolates From HIV/AIDS Patients in Iran 1999-2024: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is one of the most common infections of the genital tract in women of reproductive age. In this umbrella review, we aim to summarize all the existing literature about different treatment strategies for vulvovaginal candidiasis. This umbrella review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines, systematically searching databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science for meta-analyses for assessing different treatment methods for vaginal candidiasis until September 2024. Data extraction focused on outcome metrics, and methodological quality assessed via the AMSTAR-2 checklist. In our study, we have included a total of five articles. Within pharmacological interventions, treating individuals with fluconazole, ketoconazole, clotrimazole, and oteseconazole has demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of mycological recurrence at the 12-month mark. Moreover, women who were treated with fluconazole experienced fewer episodes of VVC recurrence immediately after treatment, as well as at the 3- and 6-month follow-up periods when compared to those who received a placebo. In terms of non-pharmacological interventions, the combination therapy involving Redcore lotion alongside miconazole exhibited more substantial results in decreasing episodes of VVC compared to miconazole used alone. Furthermore, our results revealed a negative correlation between probiotic consumption and the rate of recurrence. In the end, we examined the primary treatment methods for vulvovaginal candidiasis and highlighted that, apart from azoles and antibiotics, emerging treatments such as probiotics and Redcore, along with certain established antibiotics, can also be considered viable options. More studies are needed to find more effective treatments as well as treatments for specific conditions such as pregnancy or immunodeficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39907782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.