ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Evidence-based recommendations for comprehensive regulatory guidelines in medical devices: the imperative for global harmonization.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of knowledge, attitude, and practice survey on materiovigilance among healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Applications of Nanofabrication Technologies in the Preparation of Biomimetic Structures.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Regulatory science for AI-basedJournal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Challenges and Strategies in Hydrogel-Based Cartilage Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mapping Biomedical Engineering Education and Research in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Bibliometric and Systematic Analysis.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The medical device industry has experienced a significant upsurge in the number, diversity, and complexity of devices over the last two decades. As the global demand for medical devices grows, regulatory frameworks across major economies, including the USA, Europe, India, China, and Australia, have evolved to ensure safety, quality, and efficacy. This review critically examines the regulatory guidelines for medical devices across these regions, emphasizing the need for harmonization to streamline approval processes and reduce regulatory barriers. While countries like the USA and Europe have well-established regulatory systems-such as the Food and Drug Authority (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-other nations, including India, are rapidly advancing their frameworks, as seen with the introduction of the Indian Medical Device Rules, 2017, and subsequent amendments. Global initiatives, such as the Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF), Central Drug Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO), EU Medical Device Regulations (MDR), In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR), and the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF), have made strides in fostering collaboration, yet disparities remain. Harmonized regulations would mitigate challenges related to device registration, manufacturing, and post-market surveillance, expediting access to high-quality, safe medical devices. The review also highlights the growing prevalence of drug-device combination products, their regulatory complexities, and the importance of aligning regulatory practices globally. A harmonized regulatory framework is essential to promote innovation, reduce duplication of work, and ensure the timely availability of medical devices to patients in need. This review explores the evolution of medical devices from ancient practices to modern technologies, emphasizing projected market growth and the need for regulatory harmonization to facilitate innovation and access. It also assesses how emerging technologies are shaping future regulatory frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39907781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.