ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Machine learning insights into patient satisfaction following lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Staged Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Targeting Driver and Compensatory Structural Segments for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Novel Strategy and Early Outcomes.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Anterior lumbar spine reconstruction and fusion to restore lordosis and disc height for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc prolapse. Functional and radiological outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Influence of endplate degeneration on fusion process in lateral lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) has become a minimally invasive procedure for treating degenerative lumbar conditions. While it offers reduced blood loss and faster recovery, patient satisfaction following LLIF surgery shows significant variability. Identifying the factors influencing satisfaction is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes and improving patient care. This study aims to determine key factors affecting patient satisfaction after LLIF surgery using machine learning (ML) models, including Random Forest, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN). Additionally, the study evaluates the predictive performance of these models to identify the most influential factors contributing to postoperative satisfaction.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 149 patients who underwent LLIF surgery. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were collected, including patient demographics, clinical measures, surgical details, and functional outcomes. Based on these variables, ML models were used to predict patient satisfaction vs. not satisfied) satisfaction (s. Model performance was evaluated using fivefold cross-validation, with metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
resultsOf the 149 patients, 85.2% reported satisfaction with the surgical outcome. Random Forest achieved the highest predictive performance, with an average accuracy of 82.6%, precision of 83.6%, recall of 99.2%, and an F1 score of 90.7%. Key factors influencing patient satisfaction included the preoperative low back pain score, social life function, and postoperative improvements in walking ability and mental health. Surgical factors, such as the number of fused segments and endplate injury, had less influence on satisfaction.
conclusionsFunctional outcomes, particularly improvements in low back pain, walking ability, and mental health, are the primary determinants of patient satisfaction following LLIF surgery. In contrast, surgical factors play a less significant role. Mental health emerged as a critical factor, underscoring the importance of addressing psychological recovery through preoperative counseling and personalized postoperative care. The analysis demonstrated that ML models, especially Random Forest, are effective tools for identifying the factors most predictive of postoperative satisfaction. These findings highlight the potential of ML techniques to enhance personalized treatment planning and improve outcomes by focusing on both physical and mental recovery. Further research, including multi-center studies and the integration of psychological variables, is needed to provide a more comprehensive understanding of patient satisfaction after LLIF surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39907777What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.