Observational studyEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Cervical pedicle screw placement with patient-specific 3D-printed guides: accuracy and safety in a clinical experience.
Observational study in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Workflow of a Comanipulation-Based Robotic System for Cervical Spine Surgery.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Article
- Case Report: Dorsal stabilization of an occipito-atlanto-axial malformation in a Miniature Dachshund using 3D planning and a patient-specific titanium implant.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Enhancing C2 pedicle screw placement in Hangman's fractures: a comparative study of navigation and 3D printed guidance techniques.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Novel cervical pedicle screw design to enhance the safety insertion without compromising biomechanical strength.PloS one · 2025Article
- Case Report: Cervical carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK pedicle screw fixation with 3D custom-made template guides for spinal oncology surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCervical pedicle screw (CPS) instrumentation offers significant biomechanical advantages compared to lateral mass or transarticular fixation. Nonetheless, malpositioning complications constitute a relevant concern. Customized patient-specific 3D-printed templates have been developed to improve CPS placement accuracy and safety. The aim of this study is to present our experience with this surgical technique and its accuracy and safety in a clinical setting.
methodsThis single-center retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data included patients undergoing CPS fixation surgery using a patient-specific 3D template guide system. All patients underwent a 3D-volumetric high-resolution CT scan of the cervical spine for preoperative surgical planning. Postoperative CT scans were used to evaluate pedicle perforation, CPS trajectories, and deviations between the planned and the actual screw position.
resultsA total of 115 CPS were implanted in 25 patients, with 107 (93.1%) of the screws completely placed inside the pedicle. Cortical breach within 2 mm was observed in 8 (6.9%) cases, with no cases of more severe pedicle infractions or perioperative neurovascular complication. No differences of CPS accuracies were found between each metameric fusion level, and between monolateral or bilateral templates. Mean total deviations were 0.75 mm vertically and 0.51 mm horizontally at the screw entry point, and 0.72 mm vertically and horizontally at the narrowest pedicle point. Mean total sagittal and transverse angular deviations were 2.94° and 3.04°, respectively.
conclusionCervical pedicle screw placement using patient-specific guides is safe and accurate, supporting the feasibility of this technique in posterior cervical spine fusion surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39907775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.