ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Inclusion of tumor periphery in radiomics analysis of magnetic resonance images does not improve predictions of preoperative therapy response in patients with rectal cancer.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Interpretable machine learning model based on non-contrast computed tomography within 24 hours of admission for early prediction of the risk of severe deterioration of acute pancreatitis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeTo evaluate the advantages of including versus excluding the tumor periphery and combining diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with T2-weighted imaging (T2w) for outcome predictions of preoperative radio(chemo)therapy in rectal cancer.
methodsFour analysis strategies, based on two segmentation methods and two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, were evaluated in 106 patients examined with pretreatment MRI. One segmentation method included the tumor periphery in the region of interest (ROI) encompassing the whole tumor (wROI), considered as the reference segmentation approach, and one included only the central part (cROI). Relevant radiomics imaging features were extracted from either T2w alone or from both T2w and DWI and used by a machine learning algorithm for the prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR), neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score, and disease recurrence. The area under the curve (AUC) was the performance measure. AUCs were compared with a bootstrapping method based on 10
resultscROI applied to both T2w and DWI provided the highest numerical prediction of pCR (AUC 0.76), however, not significantly superior to the other strategies (p ≥ 0.138). cROI applied to both T2w and DWI also yielded the highest numerical prediction of NAR score (AUC 0.84), showing advantages over wROI-based analysis strategies (AUC 0.66 and 0.69; p ≤ 0.008). When compared to cROI applied to T2w alone (AUC 0.73), the benefit was borderline statistically significant (p = 0.053). For prediction of disease recurrence, no differences were found between the analysis strategies.
conclusionsInclusion of the tumor periphery in radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance images does not improve predictions of the preoperative therapy response in patients with rectal cancer. Excluding tumor periphery while adding DWI to T2w improves prediction of the NAR score, although it does not affect pCR or recurrence prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.