ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Toward Machine Learning Electrospray Ionization Sensitivity Prediction for Semiquantitative Lipidomics in Stem Cells.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Detection of Polar and Nonpolar Molecules by Nano-ESI MS with Plasma Ignited by an Ozone Generator Power Supply.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Specificity, sensitivity, and high metabolite coverage make mass spectrometry (MS) one of the most valuable tools in metabolomics and lipidomics. However, translation of metabolomics MS methods to multiyear studies conducted across multiple batches is limited by variability in electrospray ionization response, making batch-to-batch comparisons challenging. This limitation creates an artificial divide between nontargeted discovery work that is broad in scope but limited in terms of absolute quantitation ability and targeted work that is highly accurate but limited in scope due to the need for matched isotopically labeled standards. These issues are often observed in stem cell studies using metabolomic and lipidomic MS approaches, where patient recruitment can be a years-long process and samples become available in discrete batches every few months. To bridge this gap, we developed a machine learning model that predicts electrospray ionization sensitivity for lipid classes that have shown correlation with stem cell potency. Molecular descriptors derived from these lipids' chemical structures are used as model input to predict electrospray response, enabling quantitation by MS with moderate accuracy (semiquantitation). Model performance was evaluated via internal and external validation using cultured cells from various stem cell donors, achieving global percent errors of 40% and 20% for positive and negative electrospray ion modes, respectively. Although this accuracy is typically insufficient for traditional targeted lipidomics experiments, it is sufficient for semiquantitative estimation of lipid marker concentrations across batches without the need for specific chemical standards that many times are unavailable. Furthermore, the precision for model-predicted concentrations was 16.9% for the positive mode and 7.5% for the negative mode, indicating promise for data harmonization across batches. The set of molecular descriptors used by the models described here was able to yield higher accuracy than those previously published in the literature, showing high promise toward semiquantitative lipidomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.