Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907635›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025

Toward Machine Learning Electrospray Ionization Sensitivity Prediction for Semiquantitative Lipidomics in Stem Cells.

Alexandria Van Grouw, Markace A Rainey, Olivia K Reid, Molly M Ogle, Samuel G Moore, Johnna S Temenoff, Facundo M Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandria Van GrouwSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlanta Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-1354
Markace A RaineySchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlanta Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Olivia K ReidSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlanta Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Molly M OgleSystems Mass Spectrometry Core, Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Drive NW, Atlanta, Georgia Samuel, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9802-5190
Samuel G MooreSystems Mass Spectrometry Core, Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, 315 Ferst Drive NW, Atlanta, Georgia Samuel, USA.
Johnna S TemenoffThe Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, 313 Ferst Drive NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3940-3574
Facundo M FernándezSchool of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 901 Atlanta Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.

Funding

Deep Ovarian Cancer MetabolomicsR01CA218664 · NCI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Facundo Martin Fernandez, Jaeyeon Kim · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specificity, sensitivity, and high metabolite coverage make mass spectrometry (MS) one of the most valuable tools in metabolomics and lipidomics. However, translation of metabolomics MS methods to multiyear studies conducted across multiple batches is limited by variability in electrospray ionization response, making batch-to-batch comparisons challenging. This limitation creates an artificial divide between nontargeted discovery work that is broad in scope but limited in terms of absolute quantitation ability and targeted work that is highly accurate but limited in scope due to the need for matched isotopically labeled standards. These issues are often observed in stem cell studies using metabolomic and lipidomic MS approaches, where patient recruitment can be a years-long process and samples become available in discrete batches every few months. To bridge this gap, we developed a machine learning model that predicts electrospray ionization sensitivity for lipid classes that have shown correlation with stem cell potency. Molecular descriptors derived from these lipids' chemical structures are used as model input to predict electrospray response, enabling quantitation by MS with moderate accuracy (semiquantitation). Model performance was evaluated via internal and external validation using cultured cells from various stem cell donors, achieving global percent errors of 40% and 20% for positive and negative electrospray ion modes, respectively. Although this accuracy is typically insufficient for traditional targeted lipidomics experiments, it is sufficient for semiquantitative estimation of lipid marker concentrations across batches without the need for specific chemical standards that many times are unavailable. Furthermore, the precision for model-predicted concentrations was 16.9% for the positive mode and 7.5% for the negative mode, indicating promise for data harmonization across batches. The set of molecular descriptors used by the models described here was able to yield higher accuracy than those previously published in the literature, showing high promise toward semiquantitative lipidomics.

Indexed as

LipidomicsLipidsMachine LearningSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationStem CellsHumansLipids

Identifiers

PMID39907635
PMCPMC11863365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.