Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907626›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Validating the use of pen scores to capture behaviors expressed by cattle unrestrained in a pen.

Jamie T Parham, Jessica J Schmidt, Amy E Tanner, Mark L Wahlberg, Temple Grandin, Ronald M Lewis

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jamie T ParhamDivision of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3803-1180
Jessica J SchmidtDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
Amy E TannerDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Mark L WahlbergDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Temple GrandinDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Ronald M LewisDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

Funding

Agricultural Research ServiceU.S. Department of Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many subjective methods exist to assist producers in evaluating temperament. Use of a pen test, which allows behavior to be observed in a nonrestrained setting, may be an effective method to evaluate temperament by allowing more variation among animals to be expressed as compared to a restrained test. The objective of this study was to analyze video recordings of penned calves to determine whether the repertoire of behaviors they expressed was adequately captured by their individual pen score (IPS) and group pen score (GPS). In each of 3 yr, 40 predominantly Angus commercial Bos taurus heifers, 2-wk postweaning , were assessed monthly in 3 consecutive months (recording periods). After routine handling through a weigh crate and squeeze chute, each heifer was released individually into a pen (12 × 6 m). Their response to 30 s of human presence within the pen was evaluated. They were then joined in groups of four in a larger (12 × 8 m) pen and re-evaluated for 30 s in a group setting. An IPS and GPS were assigned using an ethogram, with scores ranging from 1 (docile) to 6 (aggressive). This interaction was also video recorded. Using the videos, the explicit behaviors captured by each pen score were investigated using Noldus Observer software. Data were analyzed with ANOVA using SAS. Within each recording period, the concordance of pen scores with the repertoire of behaviors expressed was compared. In the group setting, heifers could not be clearly distinguished on video and were instead assigned the average GPS of the group. Heifers with higher IPS and average GPS categories had larger flight zone sizes and reached faster paces for longer periods of time. Furthermore, heifers with lower IPS appeared more neutral to the presence of a human and moved around less often. Ethograms for pen score successfully delineated the temperament of heifers. The use of such scores can provide a valuable on-farm assessment of cattle behavior during routine handling.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBehavior, AnimalBehavior Observation TechniquesTemperamentAnimalsCattleFemaleVideo Recordingbeef cattlegroup pen scoreindividual pen scorenonrestrained behaviortemperamentvalidating ethograms

Identifiers

PMID39907626
PMCPMC11912831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.