Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39907400›Full record

ReviewThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2025

Photocarcinogenesis of the skin: Current status and future trends.

Ting-Ting Yang, Cheng-Che E Lan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ADSCs-Exo ameliorates UVB-induced skin DNA damage via p62-RNF168-dependent histone ubiquitination.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Djulis (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Photocarcinogenesis of the skin: Current status and future trends.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ting-Ting YangDepartment of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Medical University Gangshan Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9515-5336
Cheng-Che E LanDepartment of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solar radiation is essential for life on Earth but is also a major contributor to skin carcinogenesis. Solar radiation, particularly ultraviolet (UV) B (280-320 nm) and UVA (320-400 nm), induces photocarcinogenesis via various pathways. UV light can directly cause DNA damage, resulting in genetic mutations if not repaired correctly. UV light can also induce photocarcinogenesis by generating reactive oxygen species, inducing immunosuppression and inflammation. Recently, visible light (400-760 nm) has been shown to contribute to photocarcinogenesis by activating oxidative pathways. In addition to the irradiation dose (fluence, J/m

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisSkinSkin NeoplasmsUltraviolet RaysAnimalsDNA DamageHumansReactive Oxygen SpeciesReactive Oxygen Speciesskin cancerultraviolet radiationvisible light

Identifiers

PMID39907400
PMCPMC11964104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.