ArticleCardiovascular research2025
Single cell RNA sequencing of haematopoietic cells in fresh and frozen human atheroma tissue.
Article in Cardiovascular research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caveola and Its Resident Proteins, Caveolin-1 and -2, Play Critical Roles in the Pathogenesis of nAMD and PCV.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- A single-cell and spatial atlas of plaque macrophage states in human atherosclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Proteomic and histopathologic profiling reveal molecular features and clinical biomarkers of coronary atherosclerosis.Biomarker research · 2025Article
- Integrated single-cell atlas of human atherosclerotic plaques.Nature communications · 2025Article
- RNA degradation patterns in cardiac tissues kept at different time intervals and temperatures before RNA sequencing.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful method for exploring the cellular heterogeneity within human atheroma but typically requires fresh tissue to preserve cell membrane integrity, limiting the feasibility of large-scale biobanking for later analysis. The aim of this study was to determine whether cryopreservation of fragile and necrotic atheroma tissue affects the viability and transcriptomic profiles of haematopoietic cells in subsequent scRNA-seq analysis, enabling the use of cryopreserved atheroma samples for future research. METHODS AND
resultsWe performed scRNA-seq on five paired fresh and cryopreserved atheroma samples-three from coronary arteries and two from carotid arteries. Each sample was enzymatically digested, sorted for CD45+ haematopoietic cells, and processed using the 10× Genomics scRNA-seq workflow. Half of each sample was processed immediately, while the other half was cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen for an average of 5 weeks before thawing and processing. In carotid artery samples, we noted the absence of LYVE1+ macrophages, likely due to the loss of the adventitial layer during endarterectomy procedures. Our results indicated that cryopreservation modestly affected cellular integrity, leading to an increase in the relative abundance of mitochondrial RNA in frozen samples. Minimal differences were observed between fresh and cryopreserved samples in uniquely detected transcripts, cell clustering, or transcriptional profiles within haematopoietic populations.
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that cryopreserved human atheroma samples can be successfully profiled using scRNA-seq, with comparable transcriptomic data to that obtained from fresh samples. These findings suggest that cryopreservation is a viable method for biobanking atheroma tissues, facilitating large-scale studies without the need for immediate sample processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.